Population growth was the biggest development of the classical period, true or false?
False. Population growth was simply a side effect of the other developments of the time. Once the other developments began to take form then population growth became a key factor in the progession of those developments. I am talking about devlepments such as the mass domestication of animals. Without such developments the population growth that we saw occur in that time period would not have been possible because there simply would not have been enough food. People did not start having a ton of kids and then find ways to feed all of them, it was the other way around. That being said, once there was enough food to have a large population then people could develop other things such as metal tools, new farming methods, new ways to build buildings or run governments. So while it while it was important in developing other things, population growth itself was not the biggest development of the period.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
i disagree i think pop. growth was the core of the developments of the time
I believe that poplulation growth was a very signifigant development. I think that it's true that other developments helped to make population keep growing, i think thatm population was a very important development on its own.
yea no i think that your wrong!! and i would say more about it but i have to be done now soo yeaa. but ur wrong im right to sum up.
Post a Comment